7YT
Seven Year
Tribulation
Theory is False
I. Summary of The Seven
Year Tribulation Theory
II. Difficulties with
the Seven Year Tribulation theory should cause us to
ask the question, "Is it true or false?"
III. If the Seven Year
Tribulation theory is false, then what was the
Tribulation?
IV. When is the second
coming according to Jesus?
___________________________________________
I. Summary of The Seven
YearTribulation Theory
The tribulation
is a future time of world distress lasting seven
years. The Antichrist will rule the world as a political
and religious leader for the seven years. The first
three and one half years will be a time of peace and
prosperity. The Antichrist then puts an end to sacrifice
and offering in the rebuilt temple. The last half of the
seven years is a world holocaust never matched since the
beginning of time. The Christian believers will be
raptured out either in the beginning (pre-trib), middle
(mid-trib) or after the seven years (post-trib).
Armageddon, the last big war, will bring an end to this
world as we know it. Christ will then come again with
His raptured saints to establish a Kingdom of God on
earth called the millennium.
II. Difficulties with
this theory should cause us to ask the question, "Is
the Seven Year Tribulation theory true or false?"
This
tribulation scenario is not found in the Bible. This
theory is created by combining interpretations of
various passages from both the Old Testament and New
Testament, assuming they are related, and piecing them
together into this theory of prophecy. The basis of
this theory is found in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke
21. Jesus told the disciples the temple would be
completely torn down. The disciples asked Him when
this would happen, what would be the sign of His
coming and the end of the age. Jesus proceeded to list
the signs of things to come. The events He listed
showing the signs of His coming and the end of the age
is known as the Olivet Discourse. Although this
discourse is the foundation of the Seven Year
Tribulation Theory, they show almost nothing in
common. Consider:
1.
Jesus never said the tribulation would be 7 years.
2.
Jesus said all would happen in their generation.
3.
Jesus never suggested any sizable time gaps between
the signs.
4.
Jesus never said the Antichrist would rule the
world.
5.
Jesus never said the tribulation would involve the
entire world.
6.
Jesus never suggested the temple would be rebuilt
after it was torn down. There is no prophecy in the
entire Bible that a fourth and future temple will be
built.
7.
Jesus never said the first half of this tribulation
would be prosperous, while the second half would be
the time of great distress.
8.
Jesus never said Armageddon would bring an end to
the entire world.
III. If the Seven Year
Tribulation theory is false, then what was the
Tribulation?
In about
A.D.30, speaking of the temple building standing before
them, Jesus said it would all be torn down. The
disciples asked Jesus when this would be, and what would
be the signs of His coming and the end of the age. In
the sequence of signs, Jesus replied that Jerusalem
would be laid desolate in a time of great distress. This
time of great distress is the Tribulation. Known history
shows the first century desolation of Jerusalem happened
EXACTLY as Jesus said it would. That was the
Tribulation, the time of great distress.
IV. When is the second
coming according to Jesus?
An author's
intent can only be determined by an evaluation of the
consistency of his statements, without regard to the
desired outcome. The desired outcome of the Seven Year
Tribulation Theory is that Christ will come again in our
near future. Curiously, Bible statements consistently
show God intended that Christ would return a second time
in the generation of the disciples, in their future. The
disciples were not to know the day or hour, but they
were given a time frame. Many biblical statements
consistently confirm a time frame of the late first
century. Read the time statements and reconsider! A
partial listing of the time statements is found at Bible
Prophecy:
End Time in the First Century
Time
statements give the time frame for the end of the age
and the second coming.
The last day,
the day of visitation, the end, the end of the age, and
the last hour are always associated with the second
coming of Christ, which the New Testament consistently
says would happen in the first century in the generation
of the Apostles. These are the "time statements." Though
no one knew the day or hour, the disciples did know a
time frame. See A
Christian Dilemma: time statements for a partial
list of the time statements.
PROPHECY
PARADOX: The Case for a First Century End Time
presents a literal case for the complete fulfillment
of Bible Prophecy by the end of the first century.
This book is documented from original sources. Every
sign Jesus predicted leading to the end of the age
and His second coming is historically documented in
His generation. This book is supported by extant
Greek and Roman history in conjunction with biblical
history. Sources for this book include The Life
and Works of Josephus, a history of Rome by
Dio Cassius, the Dead Sea Scrolls and many others.
This book is unique in that the second coming is
shown to be a literal event which occurred in A.D.79
instead of A.D.70. Read
the
historic fulfillment of prophecy This site
reviews PROPHECY PARADOX: The Case for a First
Century End Time.
If
you would like to order a copy of PROPHECY
PARADOX: The Case for a First Century End Time,
see Order
Information for more information.
A
Visible Second Coming: This list of New
Testament verses shows consistent biblical intent
that first century Christians would live to see both
a literal and visible return of Christ to gather His
elect.
Creative
Christianity: New evidence is turning up that
Jesus did indeed return for His elect, in power and
glory during the first century. In our attempt to
place the second coming of our Lord in OUR future,
rather than the generation of the Apostles, are we
creatively altering the Bible to suit our own
preference?
Bible
Prophecy:
Faulty Assumptions Faulty assumptions distort
accurate assessment of Bible prophecy. Have you made
any faulty assumptions? Check out this list!
Tough
Questions for Tough Christians If Jesus
preached He would return a second time in the first
century, perhaps we should consider He was right.
Link
to other preterist pages The Preterist
Archive
You may order PROPHECY
PARADOX:
The Case for a First Century End Time,
through Amazon.com
or
the publisher.
:
Contact
|